On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:51:26AM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 06:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >According to David Allan on 3/2/2010 3:13 PM:
> >>---
> >> tools/virsh.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
> >>index a6a637d..e52b011 100644
> >>--- a/tools/virsh.c
> >>+++ b/tools/virsh.c
> >>@@ -5221,6 +5221,47 @@ cmdVolDelete(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
> >>
> >>
> >> /*
> >>+ * "vol-zero-out" command
> >>+ */
> >>+static const vshCmdInfo info_vol_zero_out[] = {
> >>+ {"help", gettext_noop("zero out a vol")},
> >>+ {"desc", gettext_noop("Ensure further reads from a volume return
> >>zeroes.")},
> >
> >Unrelated to your patch, but is there any reason we don't use N_() as the
> >idiomatic counterpart to _(), rather than spelling out gettext_noop
> >everywhere?
> >
>
> I assume inertia, but someone else may have a better answer.
Historical accident :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list