On 03/02/2010 06:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
According to David Allan on 3/2/2010 3:13 PM:--- tools/virsh.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c index a6a637d..e52b011 100644 --- a/tools/virsh.c +++ b/tools/virsh.c @@ -5221,6 +5221,47 @@ cmdVolDelete(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) /* + * "vol-zero-out" command + */ +static const vshCmdInfo info_vol_zero_out[] = { + {"help", gettext_noop("zero out a vol")}, + {"desc", gettext_noop("Ensure further reads from a volume return zeroes.")},Unrelated to your patch, but is there any reason we don't use N_() as the idiomatic counterpart to _(), rather than spelling out gettext_noop everywhere?
I assume inertia, but someone else may have a better answer. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list