Re: [libvirt] [PATCH option 1] Use fallocate directly if possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:08:50AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Daniel Veillard on 3/2/2010 9:53 AM:
> >>> +#if defined(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) && !defined(HAVE_FALLOCATE)
> >>
> >> Redundant parenthesis.  I know upstream gnulib's maint.mk warns about
> >> them; did we turn them off in libvirt's 'make syntax-check'?
> > 
> >   Hum,  what's redundant here ?
> 
> It's perfectly acceptable (and less typing) to do:
> 
> #if defined HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE && !defined HAVE_FALLOCATE
> 
> Whether it is also more legible is a matter of opinion.

  Never seen the second form, and I prefer the first one personally :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]