On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:19:12 +0100, Erik Skultety wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:10:43AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:59:47 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > > After the recent fixes, it's now confirmed to work. > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/121 > > > > > > Should it be closed then? > > > > Good point, we should start using the "magic" keywords that GitLab recognizes > > an closes issues automatically. > > Or just close it manually after the person confirms that it's fixed. > > In cases such as this you don't want to close the issue with a > push-event if you can't test that the patches indeed fix the issue. Wait, what? If that were the case and we could have not verified reliably that the patches indeed fixed the issue, such patches should have never been accepted in the first place, this is a retroactive effort, the work has been done already, so you DO want to close it automatically ideally. Of course, no argument against good old manual handling :).
