On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:44:19PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Roman Bolshakov wrote: > > An outstanding issue is whether management applications can rely on the > > value of /machine/accel/type and output of qom-list-types command [2][3] > > to get current and present accels? > > > > i.e. would it be ok if libvirt assumes that everything up to the first > > dash in the accel type is the name of the accel (as specified via -M > > accel=ACCEL flag) when it performs QEMU probing? > > Hmm, I think it is not nice - we shouldn't have to parse the > accel type names - IMHO typenames should be considered arbitrary > opaque strings, even if they'll not be expected to change. > Thanks Daniel. I'll then send v2 of ad-hoc QMP/HMP query. By the way, do we need the HMP query if we get accel in QOM? Regards, Roman
