On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 15:56:31 +0200, Markus Schade wrote: > Am 06.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Jiri Denemark: > > But, since I don't really like going through the CPU model definition > > again (even though it would be just a diff), I can do these trivial > > changes just before pushing. Just let me know if you're OK with this and > > reply to my question in patch 2/4. > > > > And I apologize for incorrectly saying Ryzen 9 3900X should be EPYC > > (it's actually EPYC-Rome), which influenced my suggestion to not update > > Ryzen-9-3900X-12-Core.json with new models supported by QEMU. But don't > > worry, I'll do this myself as a follow-up patch since it is my fault. > > Feel free to make any changes, you think are still necessary. If I > can/should do a v3, please let me know. With the suggested changes Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> I squashed the patches in one, added the three missing features and pushed the result. Thanks. Jirka
