Am 06.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Jiri Denemark: > But, since I don't really like going through the CPU model definition > again (even though it would be just a diff), I can do these trivial > changes just before pushing. Just let me know if you're OK with this and > reply to my question in patch 2/4. > > And I apologize for incorrectly saying Ryzen 9 3900X should be EPYC > (it's actually EPYC-Rome), which influenced my suggestion to not update > Ryzen-9-3900X-12-Core.json with new models supported by QEMU. But don't > worry, I'll do this myself as a follow-up patch since it is my fault. Feel free to make any changes, you think are still necessary. If I can/should do a v3, please let me know. Best regards, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature