Re: [PATCH 08/13] conf: Parse and format HMAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:49:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> To cite ACPI specification:
> 
>   Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table describes the memory
>   attributes, such as memory side cache attributes and bandwidth
>   and latency details, related to the System Physical Address
>   (SPA) Memory Ranges. The software is expected to use this
>   information as hint for optimization.
> 
> According to our upstream discussion [1] this is exposed under
> <numa/> as <cache/> under NUMA <cell/> and <latency> or
> <bandwidth/> under numa/latencies.
> 
> 1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2020-January/msg00422.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  docs/formatdomain.html.in                  |  88 ++++++
>  docs/schemas/cputypes.rng                  | 110 ++++++-
>  src/conf/numa_conf.c                       | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  src/conf/numa_conf.h                       |  33 ++
>  src/libvirt_private.syms                   |   6 +
>  tests/qemuxml2argvdata/numatune-hmat.xml   |  52 +++
>  tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/numatune-hmat.xml |   1 +
>  tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c                    |   1 +
>  8 files changed, 625 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/numatune-hmat.xml
>  create mode 120000 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/numatune-hmat.xml
> diff --git a/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/numatune-hmat.xml b/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/numatune-hmat.xml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b20ca0e439
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/numatune-hmat.xml
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +<domain type='qemu'>
> +  <name>QEMUGuest</name>
> +  <uuid>c7a5fdb2-cdaf-9455-926a-d65c16db1809</uuid>
> +  <memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory>
> +  <currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory>
> +  <vcpu placement='static'>12</vcpu>
> +  <os>
> +    <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>
> +    <boot dev='hd'/>
> +  </os>
> +  <features>
> +    <acpi/>
> +    <apic/>
> +    <pae/>
> +  </features>
> +  <cpu>
> +    <numa>
> +      <cell id='0' cpus='0-3' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'>
> +        <cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
> +          <size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
> +          <line value='8' unit='B'/>
> +        </cache>
> +      </cell>
> +      <cell id='1' cpus='4-7' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
> +      <cell id='2' cpus='8-11' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
> +      <cell id='3' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
> +      <cell id='4' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
> +      <cell id='5' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
> +      <latencies>
> +        <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='5'/>
> +        <latency initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' value='10'/>
> +        <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
> +      </latencies>

Functionally the XML looks find to me, but I was just thinking it looks
a bit wierd to have <bandwidth> under a <latencies> wrapper. I'm not
entirely sure what better name we should use - perhaps "interconnects" ?

       <interconnects>
         <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='5'/>
         <latency initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' value='10'/>
         <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
       </interconnects>

any other ideas ?


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux