On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 10:21 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:18:51AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 09:57 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Although this lockdown message suggests opening a merge request, and > > > we wouldn't immediately be using merge requests for libvirt.git, I > > > dont think that's a problem. The number of people who'll see and follow > > > this lockdown message is going to be pretty small to start with at least, > > > so its not a big deal if we tell them to use MR right now. > > > > That's fair, but even for those few people why wouldn't we point > > them to the current documentation for the time being and only start > > pointing them to GitLab merge requests once we actually move to that > > workflow? > > I think that's just unnecessary churn, with no real benefit, especially > since this lockdown will be replicated across all the repos. I disagree, but on the other hand I *do* agree that this is likely to only hit a very small population, so I won't stand in the way. Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
