On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:57:46AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:23:03PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 11:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > +++ b/.github/lockdown.yml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ > > > +pulls: > > > + comment: | > > > + Thank you for your interest in the libvirt project. > > > + > > > + Since this repository is a read-only mirror of the project's > > > master repostory hosted on GitLab, merge requests opened here > > > are not processed. > > > > Maybe s/merge/pull/ here? Since we're adding a comment on GitHub and > > targeting GitHub users when doing so, it might be more appropriate to > > use the GitHub term. > > > > Everything else looks good, but there's the obvious caveat that we > > can't merge the commit as-is until we have actually moved to GitLab. > > Now that we've got the release out of the way, I want to do the switch > to GitLab as the master repository in the next day or two. I've got > everything prepared that we need now I believe. Must just flip the repo > mirror job into reverse and make the old repos read-only to current > maintainers to prevent acceidental pushes to the wrong place. I'll plan > to do this on Tuesday, approx 1200 GMT give/take an hour. Maintainers > will merely need to update their git origin URL, nothing more. > > Although this lockdown message suggests opening a merge request, and > we wouldn't immediately be using merge requests for libvirt.git, I > dont think that's a problem. The number of people who'll see and follow > this lockdown message is going to be pretty small to start with at least, > so its not a big deal if we tell them to use MR right now. Sounds good to me. Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
