On 12/20/19 8:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 02:25:27PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
If users wish to use different name for exported disks or bitmaps
the new fields allow to do so. Additionally they also document the
current settings.
Is there a reason why users would want to change the names ?
Right now, with only a single job possible at a time, libvirt picks a
predictable name based on the guest disk being exported. But in the
future, when we permit multiple jobs in parallel, it may become
important to know which name is related to which job, or even to pick
names based on what the client expects. I'm not sure we have an
essential use case yet, but I'm also not rejecting this.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
