On 12/18/19 5:34 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 05:41 PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> src/util/virutil.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/util/virutil.c b/src/util/virutil.c
>>> index ed1f696e37..8c255abd7f 100644
>>> --- a/src/util/virutil.c
>>> +++ b/src/util/virutil.c
>>> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ virGetHostnameQuiet(void)
>>> char *
>>> virGetUserDirectory(void)
>>> {
>>> - return virGetUserDirectoryByUID(geteuid());
>>> + return g_strdup_printf("%s/libvirt", g_get_home_dir());
>>
>>
>> I would suggest to use 'g_build_path' instead of 'g_strdup_printf'.
>> E.g.
>>
>> g_build_path(G_DIR_SEPARATOR_S, g_get_home_dir(), "libvirt");
>
Good catch
There's also g_build_filename which sounds simpler. Any reason for one
over the other?
- Cole
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
