On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 16:04 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 7/25/19 4:06 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > This series is RFC because the corresponding QEMU patches[1] have > > not been merged yet, and since QEMU is currently in the middle of > > the 4.1.0 freeze we can't really expect to merge them until 5.7.0 > > anyway. > > > > With that in mind, a few patches are somewhat independent of the > > rest and could, after some minor tweaking, could go in even right > > now: 1/11 is really a no brainer, and 3/11 - 5/11 are also fairly > > reasonable candidates for that treatment. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg04945.html > > > > Andrea Bolognani (11): > > tests: Update replies for QEMU 2.12.0 on aarch64 > > tests: Add replies for QEMU 4.1.0 on aarch64 > > qemu: Rename virQEMUCapsObjectPropsMaxX86CPU > > qemu: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_ARM_MAX_CPU > > qemu: Query max-arm-cpu properties > > qemu: Update query-cpu-model-expansion check > > qemu: Perform full expansion on ARM > > cpu_map: Introduce ARM CPU features > > cpu: Validate ARM CPU features > > tests: Introduce tests for ARM CPU features > > news: Update for ARM CPU features > > Once qemu part is pushed in you can count on my > > Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! :) I'm gonna push 1/11 right away as it doesn't depend on the QEMU part at all. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list