On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:06:08PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > [...] > > I wonder if there's a way to close the testing gap somehow ? Random idea > > would be a non-versioned "pc-no-deprecated" machine type, which blocks > > all use of deprecated features and does not promise any migration compat. > > Essentially it would exist just for testing purposem as a way todo > > functional tests for libvirt & mgmt apps to prove they don't use any > > deprecated features (any deprecated features, not merely this NUMA one). > > This isn't the first time I wish we had a machine type with > experimental features enabled. What about calling it "pc-next"? No objection from me. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
