On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] > I wonder if there's a way to close the testing gap somehow ? Random idea > would be a non-versioned "pc-no-deprecated" machine type, which blocks > all use of deprecated features and does not promise any migration compat. > Essentially it would exist just for testing purposem as a way todo > functional tests for libvirt & mgmt apps to prove they don't use any > deprecated features (any deprecated features, not merely this NUMA one). This isn't the first time I wish we had a machine type with experimental features enabled. What about calling it "pc-next"? -- Eduardo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
