On 4/6/19 6:28 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > On 4/4/19 12:58 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 4/3/19 5:03 PM, Ján Tomko wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:10:19PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >>>> On 4/1/19 8:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>>>> There was this introduction made on the users list: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2019-March/msg00046.html >>>>> >>>>> Add the application onto the list of apps known to use libvirt. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> docs/apps.html.in | 6 ++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/docs/apps.html.in b/docs/apps.html.in >>>>> index 209854b6ac..62914b575a 100644 >>>>> --- a/docs/apps.html.in >>>>> +++ b/docs/apps.html.in >>>>> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ >>>>> machines. It is a command line tool for developers that >>>>> makes it very >>>>> fast and easy to deploy and re-deploy an environment of vm's. >>>>> </dd> >>>>> + <dt><a >>>>> href="https://github.com/virt-lightning/virt-lightning";>virt-lightning</a></dt> >>>>> >>>>> + <dd> >>>>> + Virt-Lightning uses libvirt, cloud-init and libguestfs to >>>>> allow anyone >>>>> + to quickly start new VM. Very much like a container CLI >>>>> interface, but s/start new/start a new/ >>>>> + locally. 'Very much like a container CLI, but locally.' I don't really understand what this means, maybe better is 'Very much like a container CLI, but with a virtual machine.' or similar >>>>> + </dd> >>>>> </dl> >>>>> >>>>> <h2><a id="configmgmt">Configuration Management</a></h2> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't get the point of keeping this as a static page in git. It's >>>> always going to be out of date, or needing tweaks that IMO add noise to >>>> the dev mailing list. >>> >>> The changes proposed to this page have always shown a high >>> signal-to-noise ratio and are neligible to all the other changes made to >>> libvirt source code. >>> >> >> I didn't say it was _much_ noise :) But I take your point >> >>>> Can't this be a wiki page? >>> >>> One argument against a wiki page would be that the barrier for >>> contributing is higher. >>> >>> To get your change merged in git, all you need is to send an e-mail. >>> >> >> There's three cases: >> >> 1) contributor asks someone else to add app to the list >> 2) new contributor does it themselves >> 3) existing contributor does it themselves >> >> In both wiki and git worlds, #1 is just an email 'hey this app exists'. >> Like the case above: someone mentioned it on the list, and michal is >> adjusting apps.html for them >> >> #2 is not just an email: it's git clone, make the change, hopefully test >> it, then send it. >> >> #2 for the wiki yes it's painful for drive by contributors because they >> need to request an account, possibly more painful depending on how >> comfortable people are with git. >> >> #3 for both cases is indistinguishably low effort. Except the git case >> always requires minimum 2 mails to libvir-list. >> >> And every git case requires some reviewer bandwidth, CI triggering and a >> permanent git commit. >> >> Anyways I'm not gonna die on this hill, I've said my piece (again ;) ), >> if no one else is on board I'll shut up about it > > Do we have a resolution here? I like 1) and 3) and I'm volunteering for > creating the wiki page if we decide to go with 3). > Dan seemed against the wiki page too in another mail. For this change with the way up above: Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> But if you are like me and prefer the wiki page route then obviously I endorse that too Thanks, Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
