On 4/3/19 5:03 PM, Ján Tomko wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:10:19PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 4/1/19 8:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> There was this introduction made on the users list: >>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2019-March/msg00046.html >>> >>> Add the application onto the list of apps known to use libvirt. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> docs/apps.html.in | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/docs/apps.html.in b/docs/apps.html.in >>> index 209854b6ac..62914b575a 100644 >>> --- a/docs/apps.html.in >>> +++ b/docs/apps.html.in >>> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ >>> machines. It is a command line tool for developers that >>> makes it very >>> fast and easy to deploy and re-deploy an environment of vm's. >>> </dd> >>> + <dt><a >>> href="https://github.com/virt-lightning/virt-lightning";>virt-lightning</a></dt> >>> >>> + <dd> >>> + Virt-Lightning uses libvirt, cloud-init and libguestfs to >>> allow anyone >>> + to quickly start new VM. Very much like a container CLI >>> interface, but >>> + locally. >>> + </dd> >>> </dl> >>> >>> <h2><a id="configmgmt">Configuration Management</a></h2> >>> >> >> I don't get the point of keeping this as a static page in git. It's >> always going to be out of date, or needing tweaks that IMO add noise to >> the dev mailing list. > > The changes proposed to this page have always shown a high > signal-to-noise ratio and are neligible to all the other changes made to > libvirt source code. > I didn't say it was _much_ noise :) But I take your point >> Can't this be a wiki page? > > One argument against a wiki page would be that the barrier for > contributing is higher. > > To get your change merged in git, all you need is to send an e-mail. > There's three cases: 1) contributor asks someone else to add app to the list 2) new contributor does it themselves 3) existing contributor does it themselves In both wiki and git worlds, #1 is just an email 'hey this app exists'. Like the case above: someone mentioned it on the list, and michal is adjusting apps.html for them #2 is not just an email: it's git clone, make the change, hopefully test it, then send it. #2 for the wiki yes it's painful for drive by contributors because they need to request an account, possibly more painful depending on how comfortable people are with git. #3 for both cases is indistinguishably low effort. Except the git case always requires minimum 2 mails to libvir-list. And every git case requires some reviewer bandwidth, CI triggering and a permanent git commit. Anyways I'm not gonna die on this hill, I've said my piece (again ;) ), if no one else is on board I'll shut up about it >> >> Thanks, >> Cole > > No, thanks. > (no?) Thanks, Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
