On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:10:19PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 4/1/19 8:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:There was this introduction made on the users list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2019-March/msg00046.html Add the application onto the list of apps known to use libvirt. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> --- docs/apps.html.in | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/apps.html.in b/docs/apps.html.in index 209854b6ac..62914b575a 100644 --- a/docs/apps.html.in +++ b/docs/apps.html.in @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ machines. It is a command line tool for developers that makes it very fast and easy to deploy and re-deploy an environment of vm's. </dd> + <dt><a href="https://github.com/virt-lightning/virt-lightning";>virt-lightning</a></dt> + <dd> + Virt-Lightning uses libvirt, cloud-init and libguestfs to allow anyone + to quickly start new VM. Very much like a container CLI interface, but + locally. + </dd> </dl> <h2><a id="configmgmt">Configuration Management</a></h2>I don't get the point of keeping this as a static page in git. It's always going to be out of date, or needing tweaks that IMO add noise to the dev mailing list.
The changes proposed to this page have always shown a high signal-to-noise ratio and are neligible to all the other changes made to libvirt source code.
Can't this be a wiki page?
One argument against a wiki page would be that the barrier for contributing is higher. To get your change merged in git, all you need is to send an e-mail. For wiki contributions, you need to send an e-mail to request an account, and only then you can start working on the change.
Thanks, Cole
No, thanks. Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
