Re: [PATCH v2] virFileIsSharedFSType: Check for fuse.glusterfs too

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 13:16:35 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632711
> 
> GlusterFS is typically safe when it comes to migration. It's a
> network FS after all. However, it can be mounted via FUSE driver
> they provide. If that is the case we fail to identify it and
> think migration is not safe and require VIR_MIGRATE_UNSAFE flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> diff to v1:
> - fixed the function name
> - switched from for() loop into virStringListHasString
> - ignoring retval of the function in the caller
> 
>  src/util/virfile.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux