在 2018/9/13 下午4:23, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 15:58 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
在 2018/9/12 下午6:37, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
Too bad fid can go all the way to UINT32_MAX, otherwise we could
have just stored them in the pointer after offsetting them by one
and thus worked around the issue...
I guess forbidding users from using UINT32_MAX as a fid is not an
option, right?
We have discussed this. FID 0~UINT32_MAX are allowed in s390.
We shouldn't forbid users. So we have to keep the hashtable code
as it is.
That's a bit unfortunate, but okay. Just ignore the comments about
it and keep the current implementation then.
Thanks for your understanding.
--
Yi Min
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
