On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 15:58 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote: > 在 2018/9/12 下午6:37, Andrea Bolognani 写道: > > Too bad fid can go all the way to UINT32_MAX, otherwise we could > > have just stored them in the pointer after offsetting them by one > > and thus worked around the issue... > > > > I guess forbidding users from using UINT32_MAX as a fid is not an > > option, right? > > We have discussed this. FID 0~UINT32_MAX are allowed in s390. > We shouldn't forbid users. So we have to keep the hashtable code > as it is. That's a bit unfortunate, but okay. Just ignore the comments about it and keep the current implementation then. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
