On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 01:26:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > I was actually intending to take a simpler approach - just compile a > > > newer gnutls into /opt and let the website build use that. > > > > Sure, that would probably do the trick as far as libvirt.org itself > > is concerned; however, we would not only have to keep CentOS 6 > > around in the CentOS CI environment, but also figure out a way to > > reproduce the same hack there if we want to make sure changes in > > libvirt don't accidentally break building the website. > > I'd just drop the CI job and we'll deal with problems with the > website build if and when we find them In that case, going for the local GnuTLS build on libvirt.org is perfectly fine with me. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
