Re: [PATCH v1 01/18] add macros for implementing automatic cleanup functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 at 21:00, Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 01:41:59PM +0530, Sukrit Bhatnagar wrote:
> > New macros are added to src/util/viralloc.h which help in
> > adding cleanup attribute to variable declarations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sukrit Bhatnagar <skrtbhtngr@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> If you recall the recent RFC thread [1], I agreed with Pavel that we should
> introduce complete changes to each file, so that we don't need to track was has
> been already done for what file and what is still missing, so the series would
> look something like this:
>
> 1) vir<some_file>.c preparations (especially VIR_{AUTOPTR,AUTOCLEAR} might need
> that)
> 2) Use VIR_AUTOFREE across vir<some_file>.c
> 3) Use VIR_AUTOPTR across vir<some_file>.c
> 4) Use VIR_AUTOCLEAR across vir<some_file>.c
>
> ...One more thing, the commit subject of every patch in the current series
> should probably look like this:
> util: <module>: Use VIR_AUTOFREE instead of VIR_FREE for scalar types
>
> and the corresponding commit message:
> By making use of the GCC's __attribute__((cleanup)) handled by VIR_AUTOFREE
> macro, majority of the VIR_FREE calls can be dropped, which in turn leads to
> getting rid of most of our cleanup sections.
>
> [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-May/msg02391.html

I have some rudimentary queries regarding this approach:

- The <module> in commit subject should be like "vircgroup" or just "cgroup"?
- Do I create a separate series of patch even for those files who do not require
  VIR_AUTOPTR and VIR_AUTOCLEAR but only VIR_AUTOFREE,
  like viraudit.c?
- Do I use the same commit subject and message, with minor changes of course,
  for all patches in a series (AUTOFREE, AUTOPTR and AUTOCLEAR)?
- In the case of files like virauth.c which require changes in
virauthconfig.h instead
  of virauth.h, do I batch all the files virauth* together?

I am assuming that the changes to header file vir<some_file>.h
corresponding to vir<some_file>.c will be in the same series if needed.

--
Thanks,
Sukrit

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux