Re: [PATCH 02/12] Introduce new domain create API virDomainCreateWithParams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 18:31:26 CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 05/16/2018 05:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:30:33PM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> > >> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 05:40 PM +0200, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:56:12PM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> > >>>> Introduce new libvirt API virDomainCreateWithParams that allows to
> > >>>> temporarily boot from another boot device, to use another kernel,
> > >>>> initrd, and cmdline than defined in the persistent domain
> > >>>> definition. All typed parameters are optional.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The design of the API was chosen to ease future extensions.
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't really see the point in doing this. We already have the ability
> > >>> to temporary boot with a different configuration than is stored in
> > >>> the persistent XML. Just call virDomainCreateXML() passing in the
> > >>> alternative XML doc. This allows changing *any* aspect of the guest
> > >>> configuration, so we're not restricted to just bot device, kernel
> > >>> initrd and cmdline, and thus won't need to write more code anytime
> > >>> someone asks to be able to override something else too.
> > >>
> > >> I know there is the API virDomainCreateXML for creating a transient
> > >> domain and that it’s possible to temporarily replace parts of the
> > >> persistent XML with it. But my idea is _not_ to add a functionality to
> > >> override parts of the persistent XML. My idea is to provide support
> > >> allowing an easy one-time switch of the boot device in a persistently
> > >> defined domain. For s390 it’s essential to have an easy way to change
> > >> the boot configuration since it “knows” only one boot device at a time
> > >> and it has no support for interactively changing the boot device during
> > >> the boot/IPL process.
> > > 
> > > virDomainCreateXML does not change the persistent XML.  If you have
> > > an existing persistent guest, and use virDomainCreateXML it lets you
> > > start that guest with that customized XML just once, without affecting
> > > the persistent XML at all.
> > > 
> > >> I started out with a fixed API (as it was done for example with
> > >> virDomanCreateWithFiles) but than I liked the approach of providing an
> > >> more extensible and flexible API better. This is also the reason why I
> > >> used typed parameters for passing the arguments. This type of API is
> > >> also not restricted to boot order changes since it could be freely
> > >> expanded (e.g. passing file descriptors). I can certainly revert back to
> > >> the static API.
> > > 
> > > Using virDomainCreateXML is the most flexible API because it lets you
> > > changed anything in the XML for just that one boot up attempt.
> > 
> > To clarify this:
> > would it be ok for you to implement this feature (the command line parameter
> > to "virsh start") in virsh by doing the xml mangling in the virsh command line
> > tool itself?
> 
> I'm not really a fan of that, as the modifications to virsh are just as
> non-extensible as the modifications to the API. Each time someone wants
> another field customizable, we have to add new virsh CLI args and XML
> munging for them.
> 
> I could suggest a general arg 'virsh start --edit $GUESTNAME' though,
> which takes the current persistent XML, launches it in an editor,
> allowing the user to change the boot order and then starts the guest
> from this temporary editted XML using virDomainCreateXML. This is a
> conceptual fit with the 'virsh edit $GUESTNAME' command we already
> have

Another option could be instead to implement this "temporarly change &
start" to another tool, that already does XML munging: virt-xml.
In that context, adding options to edit the various bits makes sense,
so only the "edit -> start -> revert" thing would be needed there.

WDYT?
-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux