On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > "xenial" (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS) support has been in the works for a > > long time: it was "just around the corner" last December[1], but > > it's six months (and one more Ubuntu LTS release) later now and > > it still hasn't materialized; that, along with the fact that just > > a couple of months ago[2] the folks at Travis were "super excited" > > to introduce "trusty" (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS) to their Enterprise > > offering makes it very hard for me to believe we will be able to > > run builds on 16.04 anytime soon. > > I just had a chat with spice folks and learnt that gitlab.com provides > a CI system with free shared runners. The key difference from travis, > is that gitlab supports a choice of docker images to use, but does not > support os-x. > > So we could drop ubuntu from travis, leaving just the os-x builder, > and enable use of some docker images under gitlab, to get an equiv > level of coverage. Why don't we just add Ubuntu 16.04 and Ubuntu 18.04 workers to the CentOS CI environment? I'd rather avoid fracturing our CI efforts further. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
