On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 13:55:35 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 19.04.2018 um 17:25 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben: > > Similarly to the 'raw' case add tests for bochs, cloop, dmg, ploop, vdi > > vhd, and vpc. Covering all supproted non-backing formats. > > > > Note that the JSON name for 'ploop' maps to 'parallels' and 'vhd' maps > > to 'vhdx'. > > Your -drive lines below mention format=ploop/vhd, though. That wouldn't > actually work. So, is it something that we should actually forbid? I did not actually try all of the weird formats, so I just assumed that if we'd happily generate the -drive command line and the 'blockdev' version exists it's equivalent. > (Also 'vhd' as an alias for 'vhdx' is super confusing, because VHD is > really the name of the format implemented by QEMU's 'vpc' driver - which > is already a source of confusion on its own.) Hmmm, maybe that is a bug in my implementation. Since libvirt has a VPC format and also a VHD format I thohght that VHD is just another name for 'vhxd'. If they are different, we maybe should forbid it altogether. I confess that I did a simple prefix match rather than any complex analysis.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
