Re: [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to CPU frequency reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 12:52 +0100, Bjoern Walk wrote:
> Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> [2017-12-11, 05:40PM +0100]:
> > A few steps towards eventually fixing
> > 
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206353
> > 
> > The commit message for patch 6/6 contains most of the rationale,
> > previous patches are cleanups. If not for the new test case added
> > with patch 1/6, the overall diffstat would be negative.
> 
> The timings... I have a similar patch set in my queue that I wanted to
> send out today, but, well. I also have fixed frequency reporting on
> S390, which I will at least rebase on top of this.

I'm sorry! Some amount of duplicated work is kind of unavoidable
in a loosely-organized community project such as libvirt.

Hopefully rebasing on top of my series is not too much work,
considering most of it is just refactoring and cleanups.

> Before you push, I want to review this series and compare it with mine,
> but I can't make it today I'm afraid. I will find the time to do it
> tomorrow.

I'd certainly appreciate that. The series doesn't have any ACKs
yet, so there's no risk I'd push it before you can get to it :)

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux