Re: [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to CPU frequency reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> [2017-12-11, 05:40PM +0100]:
> A few steps towards eventually fixing
> 
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206353
> 
> The commit message for patch 6/6 contains most of the rationale,
> previous patches are cleanups. If not for the new test case added
> with patch 1/6, the overall diffstat would be negative.
> 

The timings... I have a similar patch set in my queue that I wanted to
send out today, but, well. I also have fixed frequency reporting on
S390, which I will at least rebase on top of this.

Before you push, I want to review this series and compare it with mine,
but I can't make it today I'm afraid. I will find the time to do it
tomorrow.

Best,
Bjoern

-- 
IBM Systems
Linux on z Systems & Virtualization Development
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland
Schönaicher Str. 220
71032 Böblingen
Phone: +49 7031 16 1819
E-Mail: bwalk@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux