On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:11:25PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Dear list, > > there is the following bug [1] which I'm not quite sure how to grasp. So > there is this application/infrastructure called Kove [2] that allows you > to have memory for your application stored on a distant host in network > and basically fetch needed region on pagefault. Now imagine that > somebody wants to use it for backing up domain memory. However, the way > that the tool works is it has some kernel module and then some userland > binary that is fed with the path of the mmaped file. I don't know all > the details, but the point is, in order to let users use this we need to > expose the paths for mem-path for the guest memory. I know we did not > want to do this in the past, but now it looks like we don't have a way > around it, do we? We don't want to expose the concept of paths in the XML because this is a linux specific way to configure hugepages / shared memory. So we hide the particular path used in the internal impl of the QEMU driver, and or via the qemu.conf global config file. I don't really want to change that approach, particularly if the only reason is to integrate with a closed source binary like Kove. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list