Re: [PATCH 2/2] conf: Introduce the virDomainNetModel enumeration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 14:36 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Would you still be against it if the enumeration was extended
> > to include every NIC model ever supported by QEMU and Xen? As
> > mentioned, other drivers already perform their own validation
> > and only accept a very limited number of models, so there's
> > no risk of regression there.
> 
> I don't think that will help. It will prevent missing any working
> configuration, but it will still make any invalid configuration vanish.

Do we really need to care that much about guests that never
had a chance to even start? I honestly don't see the point.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux