On 19.05.2017 11:03, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Guido Günther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:agx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > LGTM but I don't know much about PPC64, it's SLOF and where the device > tree should be located. > > > Hi those paths for SLOF are the default one for Debian/Ubuntu at least. > $ dpkg -L qemu-slof > /. > /usr > /usr/share > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/qemu-slof > /usr/share/doc/qemu-slof/copyright > /usr/share/doc/qemu-slof/changelog.Debian.gz > /usr/share/slof > /usr/share/slof/spapr-rtas.bin > /usr/share/slof/slof.bin > > The other paths are kernel owned and match the current state: > (the proc path is a symlink today, not sure if it was a real path back in history) > $ ll /proc/device-tree > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Mai 19 08:59 /proc/device-tree -> > /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ > $ ll /sys/firmware/devicetree/ > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Mai 19 08:57 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 Mai 19 08:57 ../ > drwxr-xr-x 51 root root 0 Mai 19 08:57 base/ > (there is much more under this path, but the rule is ** for a reason) > > Hope that helps, Was that explanation sufficient? -Stefan > Christian > > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
