Re: [PATCH] Provide a useful README file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:54:30PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:50:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The current README file contents has almost no useful info, and that
> > which does exist is very outdated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > README | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> This is great and all, but if we are making this better, why not take
> the opportunity to use some plaintext format that has few features?  I,
> personally, don't care whether that's org, markdown or rst.  Just
> something that is still usable and readable as a plaintext file while it
> can be nicely formatted (with headers, links and images) on pages that
> support it (e.g. github).  I know this seems like stupid wannabe modern
> tiny thing, but there are many nuances that can potentially influence
> future contributors.  And I think this is one of the positive ones.

Sure, I can do that.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux