Re: [PATCH] Provide a useful README file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:50:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The current README file contents has almost no useful info, and that
which does exist is very outdated.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
README | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


This is great and all, but if we are making this better, why not take
the opportunity to use some plaintext format that has few features?  I,
personally, don't care whether that's org, markdown or rst.  Just
something that is still usable and readable as a plaintext file while it
can be nicely formatted (with headers, links and images) on pages that
support it (e.g. github).  I know this seems like stupid wannabe modern
tiny thing, but there are many nuances that can potentially influence
future contributors.  And I think this is one of the positive ones.

Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux