On 02/15/2017 06:35 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx <mailto:jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit. I think you have me to blame for "tunnelled". At the time I initially wrote tunnelled migration support, I did a Google search similar to what you have done, and determined that tunnelled seemed to be slightly preferred. Subsequently almost everyone has balked at it, but I think the horse has left the barn on it and we should probably stick with "tunnelled".
Ok. I also failed to realize that the commit providing the news item used 'tunnelled'. I've sent a patch to revert the spelling change, but I'll wait for an explicit ACK this time
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-February/msg00770.html Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
