On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Joao Martins wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
--- a/docs/news.xml
+++ b/docs/news.xml
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
was <code>virtio-net</code>.
</description>
</change>
+ <change>
+ <summary>
+ libxl: add tunnelled migration support
+ </summary>
+ <description>
+ Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of
+ strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection
+ other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
+ </description>
+ </change>
</section>
<section title="Improvements">
<change>
Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating
the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup.
Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you
will find a *lot* of matches:
$ git grep tunneled | wc -l
10
$ git grep tunnelled | wc -l
1242
So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-)
Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled
being both correct.
Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to
recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I
can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.
Regards,
Jim
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
