On 06/16/2009 05:54 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:11:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Product = 0 is a valid value based on this bug report: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-May/msg00368.html > > Looks fine, ACK. > I was wondering about the vendor ID but apparently nobody uses 0 > http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids > but maybe the same cleanup should be done for vendor ID though it looks > far less likely unless there is some hardware defect. > Committed now, with a similar cleanup for 'vendor', but only to give a less ambiguous error if vendor = 0. Thanks, Cole -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list