Re: [PATCHv2 02/11] storage: Fix implementation of no-overwrite for file system backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/10/2017 01:36 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>
>> Yeah, I think if this function was called MatchFS(), CheckFS() or
>> something among those lines I'm okay with this patch. But ProbeFS()
>> makes me think that the function is just probing for existing FSs on
>> given device. Sorry for the bikeshedding :-).
> 
> No problem - I'd rather get the name right now instead of having a
> followup because someone didn't like the name.
> 
> How about FindFS() - the function is looking to "find" if a FS exists on
> the disk/partition.
> 
> That would mean ProbeEmpty could be FindNoFS or FindEmpty (and the
> fallout in the remaining patches to adjust the names).

Looks reasonable to me.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux