On 08/28/2016 08:45 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
As bhyve currently doesn't use controller addressing and simply uses 1 implicit controller for 1 disk device, the scheme looks the following: pci addrees -> (implicit controller) -> disk device So in fact we identify disk devices by pci address of implicit controller and just pass it this way to bhyve in a form: -s pci_addr,ahci-(cd|hd),/path/to/disk Therefore, we cannot use virDeviceInfoPCIAddressWanted() because it does not expect that disk devices might need PCI address assignment. As a result, if a disk was specified without address, it will not be generated and domain will to start. Until proper controller addressing is not implemented in the bhyve
s/not// :-)
driver, force each disk to have PCI address generated if it was not specified by user. --- src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c index 8373a5f..ca30e9f 100644 --- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c +++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ bhyveAssignDevicePCISlots(virDomainDefPtr def, }for (i = 0; i < def->ndisks; i++) {- if (!virDeviceInfoPCIAddressWanted(&def->disks[i]->info)) + if (def->disks[i]->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI && + !virPCIDeviceAddressIsEmpty(&def->disks[i]->info.addr.pci)) continue; if (virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextSlot(addrs, &def->disks[i]->info,
ACK. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list