On 8/11/2016 5:00 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:48 +0800, Xian Han Yu wrote:
The default is not OFF, though, it's ABSENT :)
In fact, as far as I can tell, OFF isn't ever used explicitly
either for assignment or comparison. And false is plain wrong
from a datatype point of view.
How about we change all three occurrences as boris list above
into VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ABSENT.
Sure, that's exactly what I suggested :)
IMHO, we should just do what Michael suggested right at the start of this
thread and use {0}, instead of manually initializing each field to
0, or a constant hiding the 0.
Regards,
Daniel
That maybe change back again in the future, if this struct add a new member
or current member need to be not zero-initialized.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list