On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:48 +0800, Xian Han Yu wrote:
> > > The default is not OFF, though, it's ABSENT :)
> > >
> > > In fact, as far as I can tell, OFF isn't ever used explicitly
> > > either for assignment or comparison. And false is plain wrong
> > > from a datatype point of view.
> >
> > How about we change all three occurrences as boris list above
> > into VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ABSENT.
>
> Sure, that's exactly what I suggested :)
IMHO, we should just do what Michael suggested right at the start of this
thread and use {0}, instead of manually initializing each field to
0, or a constant hiding the 0.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list