On 07/28/2016 08:02 AM, Jovanka Gulicoska wrote: > --- > src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > index 76c60ea..e7a407f 100644 > --- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > +++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > > #include "dirname.h" > #include "node_device_conf.h" > +#include "node_device_event.h" > #include "node_device_driver.h" > #include "node_device_linux_sysfs.h" > #include "node_device_udev.h" > @@ -1024,22 +1025,31 @@ static int udevGetDeviceDetails(struct udev_device *device, > static int udevRemoveOneDevice(struct udev_device *device) > { > virNodeDeviceObjPtr dev = NULL; > + virObjectEventPtr event = NULL; > const char *name = NULL; > - int ret = 0; > + int ret = -1; > > name = udev_device_get_syspath(device); > dev = virNodeDeviceFindBySysfsPath(&driver->devs, name); > > - if (dev != NULL) { > - VIR_DEBUG("Removing device '%s' with sysfs path '%s'", > - dev->def->name, name); > - virNodeDeviceObjRemove(&driver->devs, dev); > - } else { > + if (!dev) { > VIR_DEBUG("Failed to find device to remove that has udev name '%s'", > name); > - ret = -1; > + goto cleanup; > } > > + event = virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew(dev->def->name, > + VIR_NODE_DEVICE_EVENT_DELETED, > + 0); > + > + VIR_DEBUG("Removing device '%s' with sysfs path '%s'", > + dev->def->name, name); > + virNodeDeviceObjRemove(&driver->devs, dev); > + > + ret = 0; > + cleanup: > + if (event) > + virObjectEventStateQueue(driver->nodeDeviceEventState, event); > return ret; > } > > @@ -1096,6 +1106,8 @@ static int udevAddOneDevice(struct udev_device *device) > { > virNodeDeviceDefPtr def = NULL; > virNodeDeviceObjPtr dev = NULL; > + virObjectEventPtr event = NULL; > + bool new_device; > int ret = -1; > > if (VIR_ALLOC(def) != 0) > @@ -1119,17 +1131,28 @@ static int udevAddOneDevice(struct udev_device *device) > if (udevSetParent(device, def) != 0) > goto cleanup; > > + dev = virNodeDeviceFindByName(&driver->devs, def->name); > + new_device = !!dev; I know I recommended this little tidbit offline, but the logic is actually wrong :) new_device should be !dev > + if (new_device) > + nodeDeviceUnlock(); > + Wrong unlock call, we need to unlock 'dev', not the whole driver. > /* If this is a device change, the old definition will be freed > * and the current definition will take its place. */ > dev = virNodeDeviceAssignDef(&driver->devs, def); > - if (dev == NULL) > - goto cleanup; > + We shouldn't drop this NULL check either. These were the only issues in the patch series, so applied locally with this stuff fixed: diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c index e7a407f..4182d5b 100644 --- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c +++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int udevAddOneDevice(struct udev_device *device) virNodeDeviceDefPtr def = NULL; virNodeDeviceObjPtr dev = NULL; virObjectEventPtr event = NULL; - bool new_device; + bool new_device = true; int ret = -1; if (VIR_ALLOC(def) != 0) @@ -1132,13 +1132,16 @@ static int udevAddOneDevice(struct udev_device *device) goto cleanup; dev = virNodeDeviceFindByName(&driver->devs, def->name); - new_device = !!dev; - if (new_device) - nodeDeviceUnlock(); + if (dev) { + virNodeDeviceObjUnlock(dev); + new_device = false; + } /* If this is a device change, the old definition will be freed * and the current definition will take its place. */ dev = virNodeDeviceAssignDef(&driver->devs, def); + if (dev == NULL) + goto cleanup; if (new_device) event = virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew(dev->def->name, I'll push after the 2.1.0 release is out! Thanks, Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list