Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?"):
> On 27.06.16 at 18:54, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > OK. Thanks for the feedback. I'll go ahead with my plan with the
> > git commit ids named in my earlier email.
>
> The only (hopefully highly theoretical) problem I see with this is that
> we may end up picking a libvirt commit which subsequently (e.g. via
> a libxl backport) turns out to have an issue. Such a problem could be
> dealt with in the suggested the stable branch tracking model (or any
> other model not dealing with something completely frozen).
I don't think there is anything stopping us manually updating one of
these frozen "branches", should such a situation occur.
Ian.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list