Wei Liu wrote: > Hi libvirt maintainers, Sorry for the delay. Slowly catching up on mail after vacation... > > Xen's control library libxenlight (libxl) requires application > (libvirt in this case) to explictily define LIBXL_API_VERSION. Where is this requirement written? :-) > This is > lacking at the moment so libvirt's libxl driver always gets the latest > APIs. IMO, that is what we want for upstream libvirt. Downstreams can choose a specific version if they want. > We changed one of the APIs in libxl so libvirt's libxl driver > can't build at the moment. A quick glance ahead in my libvirt mail tells me you fixed this with the preferred LIBXL_HAVE_* pattern. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list