On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:31:46PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Wei Liu wrote: > > Hi libvirt maintainers, > > Sorry for the delay. Slowly catching up on mail after vacation... > > > > > Xen's control library libxenlight (libxl) requires application > > (libvirt in this case) to explictily define LIBXL_API_VERSION. > > Where is this requirement written? :-) > > > This is > > lacking at the moment so libvirt's libxl driver always gets the latest > > APIs. > > IMO, that is what we want for upstream libvirt. Downstreams can choose a > specific version if they want. > > > We changed one of the APIs in libxl so libvirt's libxl driver > > can't build at the moment. > > A quick glance ahead in my libvirt mail tells me you fixed this with the > preferred LIBXL_HAVE_* pattern. > It's already done that way. :-) Wei. > Regards, > Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list