On 28/06/16 10:12, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 02:28:39PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315 >> --- >> I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to >> 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and >> that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing... >> > > I think we should try finding out what the cause for that is. It might > be as simple as adding similar fix to yours and asking the user what > error does he see with that fix in. The idea behind that is that > scripts shouldn't need to call that initialization as that should be > part of any first call they make to the library. I agree with Martin. The weird thing is, that although the BZ says 100% reproducible, I couldn't reproduce the issue yet and AFAIK neither has Martin, so we definitely need more details. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list