On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 02:28:39PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315 --- I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing...
I think we should try finding out what the cause for that is. It might be as simple as adding similar fix to yours and asking the user what error does he see with that fix in. The idea behind that is that scripts shouldn't need to call that initialization as that should be part of any first call they make to the library.
tools/virt-admin.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/virt-admin.c b/tools/virt-admin.c
index 4acac65..7bff5c3 100644
--- a/tools/virt-admin.c
+++ b/tools/virt-admin.c
@@ -1371,6 +1371,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
+ if (virInitialize() < 0) {
If this is the right thing to do, it should be virAdmInitialize(). By using virInitialize() we're giving bad example to others as it only works in virt-admin thanks to internal.h being included, I guess.
+ vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to initialize libvirt"));
+ return EXIT_FAILURE;
+ }
+
virFileActivateDirOverride(argv[0]);
if (!vshInit(ctl, cmdGroups, NULL))
--
2.7.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list