On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:55:24PM +0000, Ashish Mittal wrote: > Thanks Daniel! > > I also sent a path on top of libvirt master using "git send-email" as > directed on libvirt.org. That patch is much more cleaner. (1) does not > have storage pool changes since OpenFlame does not use storage pools > (yet). (2) Uses the new encrypted secret passing as the others have done. Ah, that sounds great. > Some of your suggestions would still be valid on top of the master patch. > I will make those changes and resubmit. > > Can you please confirm if you¹ve received the other patch on top of > master? I will continue to make all future changes on top of master using > git send-email directly, if you so suggest. Hmm, I don't appear to have received that other patch and there is only this first patch visible in the mailing list archives https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-June/author.html I guess its possible there's a delay in our mailman delivery, but worth checking you used the right git send-email config too, in case of typos/etc Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list