On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 14:41:30 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > CPUID instruction normally takes its parameter from EAX, but sometimes > ECX is used as an additional parameter. This patch prepares the x86 CPU > driver code for the new 'ecx_in' CPUID parameter. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 52 +++++++++++++--------- > src/cpu/cpu_x86_data.h | 1 + > src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 4 ++ > .../qemumonitorjson-getcpu-ecx.data | 10 ++--- > .../qemumonitorjson-getcpu-full.data | 6 +-- > .../qemumonitorjson-getcpu-host.data | 8 ++-- > 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c > index 82921db..ae809de 100644 > --- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c > +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c [...] > @@ -1860,7 +1869,8 @@ cpuidCall(virCPUx86CPUID *cpuid) > "=b" (cpuid->ebx), > "=c" (cpuid->ecx), > "=d" (cpuid->edx) > - : "a" (cpuid->eax_in)); > + : "a" (cpuid->eax_in), > + "c" (cpuid->ecx_in)); > # else > /* we need to avoid direct use of ebx for CPUID output as it is used > * for global offset table on i386 with -fPIC > @@ -1876,7 +1886,8 @@ cpuidCall(virCPUx86CPUID *cpuid) > "=r" (cpuid->ebx), > "=c" (cpuid->ecx), > "=d" (cpuid->edx) > - : "a" (cpuid->eax_in) > + : "a" (cpuid->eax_in), > + "c" (cpuid->ecx_in) I think the removal of clearing of the ECX register from the next patch in the asm code above actually belongs here. > : "cc"); > # endif > } ACK with the above resolved -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list