28.04.2016 20:45, Maxim Nestratov пишет:
28.04.2016 20:29, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:57:14PM +0300, Olga Krishtal wrote:
In this proposal description we would like to introduce a separate pool
type:fspool. Fspool provides and manages filesystems.
Below are listed possible examples of fspool, depending on source type:
volume, directory or network.
I'm struggling a little to understand what the overal purpose is
here. Can you step back a level and describe the overall problem
you're facing and what your use cases / goals are for this proposal.
Regards,
Daniel
The main purpose of this is to have a generic API to manage
filesystems similar to storage API and be able to use these
filesystems in domain XMLs defining containers.
So ,it is a kind of abstraction of filesystem sources and backends.
Also there can be some indirect benefits but they are not the aim.
Maxim
I wonder, if my reply clarify the original message or it's still unclear
and it's better to step back more and describe the problem in more details?
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list