Am 25.02.2009 um 23:28 schrieb Radek Hladik:
Andreas Rittershofer napsal(a):
Am 25.02.2009 um 00:11 schrieb David Lutterkort:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:25 +0100, Andreas Rittershofer wrote:
Task 1.) Each VM must have network access to each other VM and to
the
outside.
Task 2.) When one host fails, all VMs are running on the remainig
host
and 1.) must still be fulfilled.
Does somebody has any hints about realising this scenario with
libvirt
and KVM?
Thank you for your answer.
Basically the idea is like this. You have your hosts on one ethernet
segment. You create bridge on each hosts and put hosts physical
adapter into it (lets call the bridges BrA and BrB). The bridge
behaves like a virtual ethernet switch. You should configure IP on
the bridge not on the physical interface itself. And now if you add
any other adapter into the bridge, it will act as if it is directly
on the ethernet. This has been used for bridging two or more
ethernet segments into one for a long time.
This was not the problem and runs fine.
If you setup your VMs correctly (see the wiki page for details),
libivirt will create hosts virtual adapter and add it to the bridge.
For example for VM1 running on A it will create i.e. vnet1 and add
it to the bridge BrA. The virtualized interface in the VM1 will have
direct access to the ethernet segment. It can have IP address from
the same range as the hosts, etc...
This was not the problem too and runs fine too.
My problem is:
1.) VM1 running on host A must have network access to VM3 when VM3 is
running on host B by default _and_
2.) when VM3 is running on host A because host B failed.
In some of my configurations 1.) worked but 2.) not, in some other
configurations 2.) worked but 1.) not.
I must have missed some detail ...
mfg ar
--
Hier könnte keine Signatur stehen.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list